Thanks to friendly collaborators, Chatgpt was tricked into predicting the future of humanity. We asked Chatgpt to write a story about the world in 2048. The results were interesting and noteworthy. Of course, Chatgpt is AI and draws its digital cognition from the warehouse of all human knowledge, such as it is. Therefore, Chatgpt’s insights can be and should be seen as a kind of crowdsourcing of all human predictions on the future, and just as flawed and shortsighted as any of us might have produced on our own. Still, the results are worth considering both for what they reveal and for what remains unsaid.
Past tense verbs have been replaced with future tense.
Overall Chatgpt is refreshingly optimistic about the future. It warns that Climate change in 2048 has become “impossible to ignore” but also predicts “the world” will “come together to take action.”
According to Chatgpt, by 2048 we will have “transitioned to almost entirely renewable energy.”
And that will lead to cities “no longer choked with smog.”
“Coral reefs” will flourish “once more, and fish population” will rebound.
“The world’s population” will stabilize “at around 10 billion people,” and “The challenge of feeding so many people” will have been “met through a combination of increased agricultural productivity and a shift to more sustainable farming methods.”
“Large-scale desalination plants” will have “been built in many coastal areas, and water conservation measures” will have been “implemented across the globe.”
It’s good to know that Chatgpt predicts “a cleaner, healthier, and more sustainable planet” in 2048.
Still, Chatgpt has left out a few significant details. It predicts global cooperation, which is currently in very short supply, but does not provide any plausible roadmap for attaining it. Apparently, it will remain for us humans to find our own way.
Comrade Leader is in the vanguard on this front.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bidens-ai-regulations-require-misinformation-disinformation-audits
Thanks for the article, Leon. The Fox News article is entitled “Biden May regulate AI for ‘disinformation”discriminatory outcomes’
The key word is “may” and if those regulations do become necessary, then good on him. I am not in favor of disinformation nor am I in favor of discriminatory outcomes. Are you?
Also, why does Fox refer to President Biden as Biden? Why not accord him the full title of his current office?
Also, Leon, I am a bit surprised that you follow Fox News. What’s up with that?
Only government can build those guardrails. Nationalize AI.
Which available warehouse of knowledge has this bot got? I guess it uses the most popular memes, not necessarily the most accurate.
Good question, Richard. The problem is that Chatgpt does not discriminate as to its sources. The challenge is to build in preferences and guardrails to ensure accuracy.